Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Info Cubic
2
What is Background Screening?
3
Why Companies Screen
  • Avoid violence in the workplace
    • 10% of job applicants have a criminal record
  • Get the right person for the job
    • 40% of resumes contain material lies or omissions about education, past employment, or qualifications
  • Reduce costs associated with bad hiring
    • Lawsuits, theft, fraud, embezzlement
    • Turnover, bad publicity, lost customers
4
Typical Screens
  • Basic Employment Screens
    • SSN Verification & Trace
    • Criminal Records Search
    • Driving Records
    • Employment Verification
    • Drug Test
  • Expanded Employment
    • Civil Records Search
    • Education Verification
    • Reference Check


5
The Process
  • Subject signs an FCRA release form, authorizing screening
  • Employer provides release form and subject data to screening agency
  • Screening Agency conducts investigation according to federal, state, local laws
  • Results provided to Employer, usually within 72 hours
  • Employer shares results with subject, as required by law
6
The Advantages of Screening
  • Eliminate uncertainty in the hiring process by basing decisions on hard information
  • Demonstrate Due Diligence in the hiring process, promoting safety in the workplace
  • Encourage open communication and honesty on the part of the Applicant
  • Excellent return on a small investment
7
The History of Background Screening
8
Humble Beginnings
  • The 1980’s . . .
    • Forward thinking Human Resource departments use Private Investigators to check on applicants
    • No organized network of public record retrievers
    • Long turn-around times, expensive research
  • The early 1990’s . . .
    • Negligent Hiring lawsuits begin to impact the bottom line of major corporations
    • Pre-employment screening becomes a specialty, and dedicated agencies begin to grow




9
A Decade of Growth
  • More and more employers awaken to the high cost of not screening applicants
  • Dedicated Pre-employment screening agencies replace traditional Private Investigators as the main supplier
  • NAPBS emerges based on desire to address common needs within the industry
10
Today
  • SHRM survey reports that 80% of HR professionals use pre-employment screening
  • Total Industry Revenue = $4 Billion
    • Public Record Retrievers (2,000+)
    • Small and Mid-size screening firms (1,000+)
    • Large screening firms, some public (50+)
    • Software and Data providers (30+)
  • NAPBS
    • Serves a rapidly expanding industry that fills critical needs in a security conscious economy
    • Continually improving standards and best practices
11
The Legal Environment
12
FCRA – Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • The “Gold Standard” for protection of consumer rights
    • Applicant must expressly authorize screen
    • Applicant must be given notice before any negative information is used against them
    • Screening agency must investigate applicant claims that report is inaccurate or incomplete
    • Report may only be used for a permissible purpose (e.g. Employment or Tenant screen)
  • Numerous state laws augment the FCRA



13
Privacy and Identity Theft
  • Screening may uncover cases of identity theft, providing a benefit to the applicant
  • Screens are restricted to relevant data about the applicant’s public life
  • Strict precautions are taken to protect the confidentiality of all reports
  • Protection of privacy and adherence to law is central to NAPBS Code of Conduct


14
Screening and the EEOC
  • Screening agency works to help employers use data correctly, in accordance with Equal Employment Opportunity Laws
  • Information used to determine eligibility for employment must be job related
  • A criminal record cannot be used to automatically disqualify an applicant, unless there is a business justification
15
The Future of the Industry
16
Trends in Screening
  • Growing public awareness and acceptance due to terrorism concerns
  • Expanding role of background screening-- tenants, contractors, team coaches, etc.
  • More comprehensive screenings, requiring more thorough research
  • Screening processes integrating with other Human Resource systems
  • Even greater emphasis on legal compliance