|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Avoid violence in the workplace
- 10% of job applicants have a criminal record
- Get the right person for the job
- 40% of resumes contain material lies or omissions about education, past
employment, or qualifications
- Reduce costs associated with bad hiring
- Lawsuits, theft, fraud, embezzlement
- Turnover, bad publicity, lost customers
|
|
4
|
- Basic Employment Screens
- SSN Verification & Trace
- Criminal Records Search
- Driving Records
- Employment Verification
- Drug Test
- Expanded Employment
- Civil Records Search
- Education Verification
- Reference Check
|
|
5
|
- Subject signs an FCRA release form, authorizing screening
- Employer provides release form and subject data to screening agency
- Screening Agency conducts investigation according to federal, state,
local laws
- Results provided to Employer, usually within 72 hours
- Employer shares results with subject, as required by law
|
|
6
|
- Eliminate uncertainty in the hiring process by basing decisions on hard
information
- Demonstrate Due Diligence in the hiring process, promoting safety in the
workplace
- Encourage open communication and honesty on the part of the Applicant
- Excellent return on a small investment
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- The 1980’s . . .
- Forward thinking Human Resource departments use Private Investigators
to check on applicants
- No organized network of public record retrievers
- Long turn-around times, expensive research
- The early 1990’s . . .
- Negligent Hiring lawsuits begin to impact the bottom line of major
corporations
- Pre-employment screening becomes a specialty, and dedicated agencies
begin to grow
|
|
9
|
- More and more employers awaken to the high cost of not screening
applicants
- Dedicated Pre-employment screening agencies replace traditional Private
Investigators as the main supplier
- NAPBS emerges based on desire to address common needs within the
industry
|
|
10
|
- SHRM survey reports that 80% of HR professionals use pre-employment
screening
- Total Industry Revenue = $4 Billion
- Public Record Retrievers (2,000+)
- Small and Mid-size screening firms (1,000+)
- Large screening firms, some public (50+)
- Software and Data providers (30+)
- NAPBS
- Serves a rapidly expanding industry that fills critical needs in a
security conscious economy
- Continually improving standards and best practices
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- The “Gold Standard” for protection of consumer rights
- Applicant must expressly authorize screen
- Applicant must be given notice before any negative information is used
against them
- Screening agency must investigate applicant claims that report is
inaccurate or incomplete
- Report may only be used for a permissible purpose (e.g. Employment or
Tenant screen)
- Numerous state laws augment the FCRA
|
|
13
|
- Screening may uncover cases of identity theft, providing a benefit to
the applicant
- Screens are restricted to relevant data about the applicant’s public
life
- Strict precautions are taken to protect the confidentiality of all
reports
- Protection of privacy and adherence to law is central to NAPBS Code of
Conduct
|
|
14
|
- Screening agency works to help employers use data correctly, in
accordance with Equal Employment Opportunity Laws
- Information used to determine eligibility for employment must be job
related
- A criminal record cannot be used to automatically disqualify an
applicant, unless there is a business justification
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Growing public awareness and acceptance due to terrorism concerns
- Expanding role of background screening-- tenants, contractors, team
coaches, etc.
- More comprehensive screenings, requiring more thorough research
- Screening processes integrating with other Human Resource systems
- Even greater emphasis on legal compliance
|